Joe Biden is responsible for the tsunami of illegal immigration over our southern border

I honestly don’t think Joe Biden has any say about anything going on in the White House. He is nothing but a puppet, signing whatever documents his Leftist handlers place in front of him. Nonetheless, his name is at the top of the letterhead, so the buck stops with him.

One of the executive orders Leftists had Biden sign in the first days was the rolling back of President Trump’s border security apparatus that was working very well to stop a tsunami of illegal immigrants and drug and human traffickers from flowing over our southern border.

Now that the Biden administration has dismantled our border security apparatus, we have that tsunami pouring over the border. It has gotten so bad that the Department of Homeland Security is begging for volunteers to step up and help:

“Today, I activated the Volunteer Force to support Customs and Border Protection (CBP) as they face a surge in migration along the Southwest Border,” said DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. The call to action was sent by Mayorkas in an email on March 8 to all employees.

In the email, Mayorkas stated, “you have likely seen the news about the overwhelming numbers of migrants seeking access to his country along the Southwest Border.” He added, “President Biden and I are committed to ensuring our Nation has a safe, orderly, and humane immigration system while continuing to balance all of the other critical DHS missions.”

All this additional help wouldn’t be required if the Leftists had just left President Trump’s border security system alone. However, those running the White House want an open border, which means they have opened Pandora’s box.

It’s gotten so bad that now even Mexico is criticizing the White House’s new immigration policy because it is undermining their nation’s border security as well and is asking Biden for help since he is causing all the problems. From the New York Post:

The Mexican government is concerned that President Biden’s asylum policies are encouraging illegal immigration and providing revenue to drug cartels through human trafficking across the US border.

Mexico has asked the Biden administration for help to provide developmental aid to Central America since many of the migrants come from countries such as Honduras, Nicaragua and Guatemala seeking asylum in the US.

President Trump had a multi-pronged policy that had illegal immigration and the drug and human smuggling cartels under control, but Biden’s handlers had him roll that all back immediately without anything to take their place. As a result, we have a human crisis at the border that is not just harming the US but is also harming Mexico, too. More from the New York Post:

One Mexican official, who requested anonymity, told Reuters the cartels have been using sophisticated smuggling methods “from the day Biden took office,”

Those strategies include keeping migrants up to date on the latest immigration rules, using technology to thwart authorities, and disguising smuggling operations as travel agencies, according to the assessments.

Why did the White House roll all of this back? Because Biden’s “campaign” ran on the argument that President Trump’s immigration policy was inhumane and needed to be fixed. However, they haven’t fixed it. They have exacerbated it ten-fold.

The DHS secretary claimed he and Biden are committed to an orderly and humane immigration policy, but at the border right now the Biden administration has far more kids in cages in detention centers than the Trump administration ever had, and they are being held longer than federal law allows, which is far from humane, according to their own standards:

The Biden Administration shattered a Trump-era record with DHS officials holding 3,200 unaccompanied alien children in custody, CNN reports. The detention of these minors shatters the 2,600 children held at the peak of the 2019 migrant surge. Many are being held beyond the 72-hour limit in facilities designed to hold large groups of adults.

CNN reviewed leaked U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) internal documents dated March 8, showing Border Patrol officials held 3,200 unaccompanied migrant children in their facilities. The agents apprehended the children after they illegally crossed the border without a parent.

The children are being held in jail-like cells that are not designed for children, CNN reported. Border Patrol is unable to release the children to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) due to the overcrowding in Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) long-term shelters. Many are being held long past the 72-hour court-imposed deadline to transfer the children out of Border Patrol custody.

The 3,200 children being held in Border Patrol cells more than doubles the number held less than one week ago, the article states.

This is the very inhumane treatment the Democrats pounded the Trump administration for, and Biden is not just engaging in the same treatment, but he is doubling down on it. Nonetheless, the Dems have yet to say anything in response. Hypocrisy, thy name is Democrat.

President Trump made a public statement about the Left’s border debacle and, in typical Trump style, didn’t mince words:

“When I was President, our Southern border was in great shape — stronger, safer, and more secure than ever before.We ended Catch-and-Release, shut down asylum fraud, and crippled the vicious smugglers, drug dealers, and human traffickers. The wall, despite horrendous Democrat delays, would have easily been finished by now, and is working magnificently. Our country is being destroyed at the Southern border, a terrible thing to see!”

Indeed it is, Mr. President.

CNN: Obesity is responsible for high rates of Covid-19 hospitalizations and deaths

Let’s be honest, it is not a nice thing to say, but it is the truth and sometimes the truth hurts.  According to a report in CNN yesterday , countries with high rates of obesity in their populations, at least 50%, had high numbers of Covid-19 hospitalizations and deaths. In contrast, countries with low rates of obesity, less than 40%, had low levels of Covid-19 hospitalizations and deaths. This pattern appears even when accounting for the age and wealth of the nations’ populations. Here are the details:

The report found that every country where less than 40% of the population was overweight had a low Covid-19 death rate of no more than 10 people per 100,000.
Vietnam had one of the world’s lowest Covid-19 death rates, with 0.04 deaths occurring per 100,000 people. The country’s overweight population comes in at 18.3%. Other countries on the low death rate list with similar patterns include Japan, Thailand and South Korea.
But in countries where more than 50% of the population was overweight, the Covid-19 death rate was much higher — more than 100 per 100,000.
In the US, where 152.49 deaths were recorded per 100,000 people, 67.9% of the adult population is overweight, according to the report.


Well, here we are, one year of living with the economically and psychologically devastating lock downs. We’ve suffered an entire year of our freedom stolen from us, small businesses forced into bankruptcy, deaths of despair because of forced social isolation, and sky rocketing unemployment. And why? Come to find out it wasn’t because “covid deniers” refused to mask up and socially distance, but because  of obese people. And to think, all this time, we could have lived normal lives if we didn’t have so many obese Americans. I don’t like writing that since I have obese friends and family members and no one likes to reading it, but it is the truth. 

So what is the best way to prevent further Covid hospitalizations and deaths going forward? It is not locking down, closing gyms, staying home, and masking up. It is not getting the non-vaccine or carrying around “immunity passports.” It is getting your caboose to the gym, going outside and taking a walk, changing your eating habits to something healthier. In other words: losing weight!

Of course, the “fat is healthy and beautiful” crowd will lose their minds when they hear that obese people are responsible for the high rates of Covid-19 hospitalizations and deaths in the US and other fat-majority nations. We can expect that they will howl that this report is “fat shaming,” that it needs to be buried and the people behind it canceled forever to make sure no one is allowed to think such unacceptable fat shaming thoughts about thin being healthier ever again. But they can not be allowed to succeed in shutting down the truth that being fat is unhealthy.
Obesity has always been a national health problem. It is a main cause of heart attacks, diabetes, high blood pressure, cancers, and other deadly diseases. That is it also responsible for high rates of Covid hospitalizations and deaths should not come as a surprise to anyone, and denying this reality will only kill more people, no matter how many masks they may wear.

Update: The New York Post reports that a gobsmacking 90% of all Covid deaths have taken place in nations with high obesity rates, and that researchers behind this new study now want to prioritize obese people for Covid shots. How is this going to work? Will fat front-line workers in hospitals and doctors’ offices going to get the shot before healthy ones?  Will the obese teachers get the vaccine first while the healthy teachers have to wait? Will younger obese people be prioritized over thinner elderly people? The elderly are at a significant vulnerability, too, but they can’t get younger while the obese can lose weight. 

I supposed prioritizing the obese will stem the problem in the short term, but it will do nothing in the long term. Obesity will still be the main source of many deadly diseases and illnesses and is almost entirely the fault of the individual obese person. Again, no one likes to hear this and I’m not saying it to be cruel because as I said I have friends and family members who are very overweight, but it is the truth.

Kurt Schlichter: the GOP is Not Going to Divide Over Gay Republicans

Kurt Schlichter and I agree on most everything, I think. For example, we support President Trump. We believe the Second Amendment was written to protect the First. We think Twitter sucks. And Ric Grennell is awesome and will be president some day.

Kurt’s most recent article at Townhall is another subject on which we agree completely. He states in no uncertain terms that the Republican party is not going to alienate or marginalize or cancel (or whatever the term is at the moment) gay Republicans just because they’re gay. Here’s the crux of his piece here:

Arbitrarily excluding groups is therefore ridiculous, and the silliness starts with identifying people by groups. Are all gay people the same? No, some are conservative, some liberal, and some don’t care at all about politics. The same with trans people. If you’re trans and a conservative, you’re welcome in the GOP. If you are trans and support the whole erasure of womanhood agenda, we are probably not the party for you. This is also true if you are cisgender and support the whole erasure of the womanhood agenda. And it is also true if you use terms like “cisgender” unironically.

The GOP is always going to split on these social issues. It’s the party where the people who still oppose gay marriage will go, but that’s not to say it can’t also have people who do support gay marriage. In fact, the main response to the gay marriage issue for the GOP base in 2021 is to put it at about #9,001 on the priority list. We have a desiccated old weirdo in the White House drooling as he watches the damn commies run rampant wrecking everything good about America and selling us out to the Chi Coms, and the last thing we are interested in is if Ted Cruz attends Jim and John’s destination wedding in Cancun.

Democrats, leftists, progressives, in essence America haters, in Washington want to tear down the United States of America and replace it with a collectivist, everyone is equal in their poverty and misery (except for themselves of course) hellhole. The fastest way to do that is to balkanize the Republican party by pitting people against each other. We aren’t going to fall for it.

Republicans don’t buy into the identity politics of the Democrat party that categorizes people based upon race, gender, sex, ethnicity, religion, etc., and then ranks them from most important to least important based upon those categories.

The Republican party is the party of Americans who just want to live free from government interference. It’s the party of the Bill of Rights, freedom, patriotism, capitalism, peace through strength, and individual liberty. Everyone who agrees with these ideas is welcome in the GOP, no matter what race, gender, sex, ethnicity, or religion.

Do you believe we should put the needs and concerns of the American people before those of the rest of the world? Welcome aboard!

Do you believe in the Bill of Rights as they are written, Second Amendment and all? Come on in!

Do you believe America is the greatest country in the history of the world, even though our nation made terrible mistakes in the past that we have worked to correct? Pull up a chair!

The Republican party will accept everyone who agrees with these tenets of freedom, patriotism, the Bill of Rights, and capitalism. These ideas are winning ideas for the Republican party that benefit every American of every background, which is why there is a concerted effort to undermine it. Don’t buy into it.

Intellectuals by Paul Johnson

Prager U is a gem. If you are living under a rock and have never heard of it before, you have to head over to Prager U and sign up. I am not being paid to say this; I’m saying it because I believe it. 

Named for Dennis Prager, Prager U filled with fantastic five minute instructional videos about historical events and people, economics, government, philosophy, culture, and so on, all taught by experts in their field. My kids love them and watch them regularly.

I joined Prager U because of the five minute videos, but my favorite part of the site is a series that I just discovered yesterday called The Book Club. Once a month, Michael Knowles and another well known conservative thinker read and discuss a great book, either fiction or non-fiction. In the first episode, Knowles and Dennis Prager discuss Man’s Search for Meaning by Victor Frankl. As you can imagine, theirs is a heavy discussion about one man’s experience living in the depths of despair and hopelessness of a Nazi concentration camp and surviving. I have been familiar with Frankl’s book for a long time but I had never read it. I’m reading it now.

After that premier episode there are discussions of Hamlet, the greatest play ever written, Pride and Prejudice, one of the greatest novels ever written, and The Divine Comedy, definitely the greatest (and longest) poem ever written. And, of course, no book club about great books could be complete without a discussion of the Book of Genesis.

One book in the series so far has really captured my attention because I’ve never heard of it before but I find it to be so timely: Intellectuals by Paul Johnson. It’s clear from Allen Estrin and Michael Knowles’ talk that Johnson’s book is the one you want to read if you want to truly understand the mind of the political Left today. The ideas the Left is trying to force down our throats today are very the ideas championed and written about by the secular intellectuals two hundred years ago that Johnson analyzes in his book.

In Chapter One, Johnson focuses on Jean-Jacques Rousseau. If you grew up believing he was a man of great virtue and truth and one of the world’s great thinkers of the enlightenment, you may be shocked to learn that Rousseau’s actions and his beliefs were in total opposition to anything resembling enlightenment. He was self-obsessed, arrogant, unwilling to accept any kind of personal responsibility, and a parasite who preyed on others’ generosity. In short, he was a conman.

Rousseau was shockingly cruel to his five children who he had with his mistress, Therese Levasseur. He abandoned all five of his babies, forcing Therese to hand them over at birth to a Paris orphanage that was unsanitary and diseased-ridden, with sky high mortality rate, without another thought. He justified his actions only after they came to light publicly by insisting he did what was best for his children, as he was protecting them from a childhood similar to his. In fact, he claimed that he wished he had had the childhood that he was providing his babies. In spite of his public declarations that he had his children’s best interests at heart, he never bothered to determine their sex, to name them, or to even record their dates of birth. Imagine the pain Therese must have felt knowing she would never be allowed to mother her own children.

The people in his life who knew him best came to the conclusion that he was a horrible human being. Denis Diderot, one of Rousseau’s closest friends, said he was “deceitful, vain as Satan, ungrateful, cruel, hypocritical and full of malice.” Voltaire called him “a monster of vanity and vileness.” 

It is no surprise then that the philosophy born from such a man as Rousseau, when applied in the real world, would have similarly monstrous results. Pol Pot of Cambodia caused mass murder and human depravity in an effort to implement Rousseau’s grand plan for human existence. Mussolini’s fascist system also applied Rousseau’s belief that all citizens, from birth, are to be trained to see themselves through the lens of the State, rather than as individuals with self-determination. 

After Johnson thoroughly dissects Rousseau, he places other “intellectuals” under his microscope for examination: Percy Bysshe Shelley, Marx, Ibsen, Tolstoy, Hemingway, Bertolt Brecht, Bertrand Russell, Sartre, Edmund Wilson, Victor Gollancz, and Lillian Hellman. Every one of Johnson’s analysis is the pulling back of the curtain to reveal how each of them is nothing more than a depraved hypocrite with delusions of grandeur.  

Many of these intellectuals, whether Rousseau, Marx, Sartre, et al., have many bad character traits in common: arrogance, self-obsession, cruelty, and – literally – filthiness. Really. Many of them stunk because they refused to clean themselves. Johnson also notes that one trend that wove its way through each of them is the tendency to claim a love of humanity while treating individual humans, including their own family members, cruelly. 

Unfortunately, it has become clear that modern day Leftists seem to possess the same combination of self-obsession, arrogance, and heartlessness as their intellectual ancestors. John Kerry, Bill Gates, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are just a handful of these new pseudo intellectuals who are convinced they alone have some kind of divine knowledge, the key to understanding and organizing the world and humanity, and expect everyone to submit to their brilliance. Also like the intellectuals of Johnson’s book, they break every rule they impose on everyone else, and when they’re called on it, they refuse to take responsibility and insist that their purpose and goals are more important.  

Read Intellectuals by Paul Johnson. Those who don’t understand history are bound to repeat it. Let’s not repeat the blind following of our so-called intellectuals. 

Democrats Take Steps to Unseat Republican Winner and Install Democrat Loser in Contested Election

When President Trump contested his November 3rd losses in various states because of election fraud, courts refused to hear his cases. It is clear the courts don’t want to get involved in what they have decided is a political matter, no matter that election laws and the Constitution have been violated. 

President Trump appealed his cases all the way to the Supreme Court, because, of course, a precedent should be set that outlines that all states must follow the Constitution when creating their election laws, which means only the state legislatures have the constitutional authority to write election law. That is what we all hoped would happen, right? That the SCOTUS would hear these cases, see that the executive branches of these states overstepped their authority and interfered in what is clearly only the legislatures’ purview and rule that the changes to those states’ election laws were unconstitutional. But that is not what happened. 

Instead, the Supreme Court of the United States played games that will only further undermine voter confidence in our elections . They refused to hear the cases because they are now moot. Amazing isn’t it? Law suits challenging election laws before elections get tossed on the grounds that the petitioners have no standing because the election hasn’t taken place so there is no injury. Then they get tossed after elections because now that the election is over, they are moot.

This decision by SCOTUS has essentially given Democrats in state executive offices under their control the license to change election laws passed by state legislatures to fit their needs because, no matter how unconstitutional those changes may be, the courts have signaled that they will not step in.

In other words, banana republic, here we come. 

If you think I am over reacting, you would be wrong because it’s clear the House Democrats have gotten the message that election laws and process are political and not legal.

Get this. We have just learned that the Democrat controlled House of Representatives has taken the first steps in a process to oust the duly elected Republican winner of an Iowa house race and seat the Democrat loser instead: 

From The Blaze:

Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R) was declared the winner of Iowa’s second congressional district over Democratic challenger Rita Hart last November by just six votes — 196,964 to 196,958.

After Iowa certified Miller-Meeks’ win, Hart appealed to the House by filing a Notice of Contest. Hart’s campaign alleged that “the Miller-Meeks campaign has sought to keep legitimate votes from being counted — pushing to disqualify and limit the number of Iowans whose votes are counted,” the Iowa City Press-Citizen reported.

Hart claims there are 22 “legally-cast, uncounted votes” from her election — and, of course, she alleges that if those votes are counted, she would be the rightful winner of the contest.

Lawyers for Hart’s campaign allege the Democrat would have won the race by just nine votes had the 22 votes not been excluded.

The House Administration Committee gathered last Friday to establish the process by which Hart’s claims will be adjudicated.

Politico reported, “The Friday meeting was brief. Members unanimously agreed to a resolution that establishes procedures the committee will abide by as it considers recent elections contested under the act.”

Miller-Meeks has asked the committee to dismiss Hart’s claims, but Friday’s action indicates the committee is taking the claims seriously. Formally rejecting Miller-Meeks’ request would begin an investigative process that could result in Miller-Meeks losing her seat if Hart’s claims are confirmed.

Can you believe this? This election took place on November 3rd in Iowa and the results were certified in Iowa. The Democrat, however, has contested the results, but she doesn’t want her objections adjudicated in Iowa courts. Rather, she has taken her objections to the House of Representatives in Washington DC, controlled by hyper-partisan Democrats who have a vested interest in increasing their very slim majority, and has asked them to decide who won. As the Blaze reports above, the Democrats unanimously agreed to begin the process of investigating the results of the election. I don’t think any reasonable person would argue the Democrats will conduct an honest investigation that will provide objective results. I mean, seriously, look at the extremes to which the Democrats went to impeach President Trump on blatantly false charges – twice. 

Will the Democrats succeed? I wouldn’t me surprised if they do. The Democrats play to the death and the Republicans fold at the first application of pressure. 

This is an unprecedented action by a political body to overturn the results of a certified congressional election. Track this process carefully. If the Democrats succeed and are able to unseat the Republican winner and install the Democrat loser, you can take it to the bank that the Democrats, should they maintain their majority in 2022, will use this process for all the contested elections their candidates lose. 

Victor Laszlo & Donald Trump

Casablanca was on Turner Classic Movies Saturday afternoon. The acting, characters, and emotional force make it one of the greatest films ever made and my personal all time favorite. It is also the source of lines of dialogue that are so famous that even now, almost 80 years after its 1942 release, people love to quote them, even if they don’t know where they come from.

“Here’s looking at you, kid.”

“Of all the gin joints, in all the towns, in all the world, she walks into mine.”

“We’ll always have Paris.”

“I’m shocked! Shocked to find that gambling is going on in here.”

“Louis, I think this is the beginning of a beautiful friendship.” 

As much as I love watching the characters deliver these lines, there’s one scene that stands out even more because it chokes me up so much: the “Play La Marseillaise” scene. I’ll set it up: Victor Laszlo is a Czechoslovakian Nazi resistance leader who has been so successful at rallying Europeans against them that they pursue, persecute, and eventually arrest him and imprison him in a concentration camp. After an unknown time of imprisonment, Laszlo escapes and makes his way, along with is wife Ilsa, to Rick’s Cafe in Casablanca, Morocco (Vichy France) in search of stolen letters of transit to America. Rick’s Cafe, owned by American expatriate Rick Blaine, is a sort of headquarters for French refugees who are themselves awaiting their own letters of transit. Rick has the stolen letters but refuses to sell them or even sell them to Laszlo. 

Victor and Rick’s argument is interrupted when they hear Nazi officers in the bar singing Die Wacht am Rhein, a German anthem. It’s the Nazis way of rubbing salt in the refugees’ wounds. Laszlo understands what’s happening and marches straight over to the cafe’s band and demands they play France’s national anthem, La Marseillaise. With Rick’s approval, the band begins a spirited rendition with Laszlo belting out the lyrics. Laszlo’s fearlessness in the face of Nazi intimidation inspires the cafe’s French refugees, and they leap to their feet and sing with impassioned pride.

The raw emotion as they sing makes this the most powerful moment in the film. Some believe it’s the most powerful scene in movie history. La Marseillaise eventually overpowers Die Wacht am Rhein, forcing the Nazis to surrender and take their seats in humiliation. Once again, Laszlo proves he is a force the Nazis can’t suppress or control. Major Strasser demands Sergeant Renault close the bar. Watch:

As I watched Victor Laszlo sing in defiance of the Nazi officers, it dawned on me that he is like Donald Trump. Or maybe Donald Trump is like Victor Laszlo. In essence, Laszlo is to Nazi resistance as Donald Trump is to globalist resistance.  Both are fearless and indefatigable in standing up to totalitarianism, which connects with and inspires others to do the same. It’s also hard to miss that the Nazis’ reaction to Laszlo is the same as the globalists’ reaction to Trump: shut it all down.

President Trump inspired patriotic Americans because he thought like they did and spoke like they did. His “Make America Great Again” wasn’t just a political campaign; it was a rallying cry for Americans whose jobs were outsourced, whose needs were ignored, and whose values were disrespected and dismissed by the globalist elites, a cabal of wealthy establishment politicians, Big Tech, Leftist activists, and mainstream American media outlets.  

Donald Trump’s win shocked and terrified all of them. From Inauguration Day on, their goal was to remove him from office.  They hounded him everywhere he went, tried to overturn every policy no matter how much it benefitted everyone, lied about him and his family, leaked private phone calls with world leaders, accused him of treason, and impeached him – twice – on ridiculously false, trumped up charges. They pursued him tirelessly until they finally managed to unseat him, but only by stealing the 2020 election. In spite of this final blow, nonetheless, President Trump refused to back down or give up. His unwavering perseverance in the face of attack after attack solidified his position as leader of the globalist resistance. When he called for a Rally to Save America on January 6th, easily close to a million people showed up.

In Casablanca, Victor and Ilsa escape to America, ensuring his resistance efforts will continue. While real life doesn’t guarantee anyone a Hollywood happy ending, it’s not yet over for President Trump. He moved back to his headquarters at Mar-a-Lago, where he is continuing to promote his America First agenda. Unfortunately, the globalists are in charge of the federal government now. You’d think they’d be thrilled but they’re not. They’re still angry and obsessed as ever with President Trump and his influence, which has made destroying him their one and only priority right now.

Nonetheless, President Trump is undeterred. He has already announced that he will begin vetting new Republican candidates that he thinks can  carry on his anti-globalist MAGA, America First policies. And later this week, he will address freedom loving Americans at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Orlando, Florida. It will be his first public appearance since his re-election was stolen from him. It will be the most watched speech in CPAC’s history. You know the globalists will be glued to his speech, too. 

Laszlo and Trump represent that rare, put-it-all-on-the-line resistance to tyranny and totalitarianism that don’t exist in movies or real life anymore. Instead, we’re told we must conform, fall in line, assimilate to the globalists’ radical agenda or we are a danger to democracy  or some such nonsense and  will be canceled. 

America was founded on Laszlo and Trump’s philosophy to never, ever give up, no matter how bad it may look, which is expressed perfectly in this exchange between Rick and Laszlo: 

Rick: Don’t you sometimes wonder if it’s worth all this? I mean what you’re fighting for.

Victor Laszlo: You might as well question why we breathe. If we stop breathing, we’ll die. If we stop fighting our enemies, the world will die.


I’m out of Coke Zero

I’m out of Coke Zero but I’m not sure I want to buy any more, not after seeing that Coca Cola has implemented a new corporate indoctrination program that demands its employees stop being so damned white. No, Coke is not telling its white employees to don black face. Rather, it appears the company is saying to be white is to be a white supremacist by default so all white employees need to be less white STAT. 

A whistleblower at Coke leaked images from the “training” (read: indoctrination) sessions that Karlyn Borysenko published on Gab. Take a look at these images: 

I don’t think I’ve ever seen anything so racist in my life. To be white is to be oppressive, defensive, arrogant, and ignorant? Every single white person on the face of the planet? According to whom? How ridiculous that someone expects white people the world over to nod and accept without question or pushback the idea that because they’re white they must be all the horrible things on the list above. It’s offensive. 

Coca Cola has come out and confirmed that, yes, they are indoctrinating their employees: 

Kyle Becker reports that Robin DiAngelo is behind the racist training: 

The LinkedIn Learning class, called “Confronting Racism, with Robin DiAngelo,” is administered online. DiAngelo, who has become famous for her infamous book “White Fragility,” has become somewhat of a celebrity by holding corporate struggle sessions on critical race theory. This has entailed charging up to $40,000 for half-day indoctrination courses to lecture audiences on the imagined perils of “whiteness” and “white fragility.

Imagine a campaign that tells people to be less black. The outrage would be massive and immediate, and appropriately so. But telling people to be less white is not only accepted but it’s promoted by a growing number of American corporations. 

No thanks. I refuse to live in the frame of Leftists (what other ideology could it possibly be?) who hate people simply because of their skin color. I’m also less inclined to buy the products of companies that promote such racial hatred and division.